To implement Article V regarding the “Appointment of a Special INDR Arbitrator,” we can establish the following structure and rules. This will ensure clarity in the appointment process, role definition, and limits of authority for the Chief Arbitrator within the Legal Counsel Governance Office, aligned with the structure of the DOI, OLC.
Here’s a breakdown of the regulation:Article V: Appointment of a Special INDR Arbitrator
Section 1: Authority and Appointment– The President of INDR may appoint a Special Chief Arbitrator temporarily, with authority granted either by the President’s executive discretion or through a majority vote in the Joint Committees.
– The position of Chief Arbitrator is strictly temporary and shall not be considered a permanent office within INDR’s governance structure.
Section 2: Temporary Nature of the Office- The Chief Arbitrator role, held at the President’s discretion or by committee vote, shall be dissolved upon conclusion of the specific investigation or arbitration.
– The position does not carry any permanent recognition within the Association’s leadership framework. It is meant only for special, designated hearings or investigations.
Section 3: Ethics Committee Oversight- The Ethics Committee shall be the sole body responsible for overseeing the appointment and the investigative process of the Chief Arbitrator.
– The Ethics Committee is empowered to lead hearings, gather evidence, and ensure that the arbitration process complies with INDR’s policies and legal obligations.
Section 4: Responsibilities and Limits of the Chief Arbitrator– The Chief Arbitrator shall act as the leader of investigations into matters assigned by the President or Joint Committees.
– The office holds the power to issue waivers of executive orders and apply INDR policies in conjunction with Association policies.
– The Chief Arbitrator must operate within the confines of INDR’s established legal framework and the policies of the Association.
Section 5: Executive Waivers and Charges- The President retains the authority to waive certain orders or policies relevant to the investigation, ensuring flexibility in the arbitration process.
– All charges or investigations shall be conducted according to both INDR and Association policies, ensuring consistency and legality in the execution of duties.
Section 6: Conclusion of Arbitration- Upon conclusion of an investigation or arbitration, the position of Chief Arbitrator will immediately dissolve.
– A report of the findings and decisions made during the arbitration process shall be submitted to the Ethics Committee and the President, ensuring accountability and transparency.
—This regulation balances executive authority with committee oversight, clearly outlining the temporary and investigatory role of the Chief Arbitrator while maintaining checks and balances through the Ethics Committee.
